AOD Thesaurus.  Annotated Hierarchy.  research methods.  R - RS4.2
b-out  To Broad Outline    d-out  To Detailed Outline     qh  To Quick Hierarchy
Previous Annotated Hierarchy section    Next Annotated Hierarchy section     Search



Rresearch method and research organization   b-out   d-out   qh
RT+JA2.4e prevention research    qh   ah
+JA2.6e treatment research    qh   ah


RAgeneral topics in research   d-out   qh
RT+JA2.4e prevention research    qh   ah

RA2research in general   qh
ST scientific investigation
scientific research

RA4definitions and theories   qh
HN Introduced 1995.
RT+AJe theory of AODU    qh   ah
+NA12.4.8e vocabulary    qh   ah

RA6paradigm   qh
SN Set of concepts, assumptions, propositions, and procedures used as models to guide scientific research.

RA8interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RA8.2.  interdisciplinary research   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RA8.4.  multidisciplinary research   qh
HN Introduced 2000.

RA10eresearch agenda   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
ST research needs
research priorities
research program
RT NM16.2 program announcement    qh   ah
+RB8 research organization    qh   ah

RA12eresearch issue   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
ST research question
RT+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah

RA14eresearch outcome   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
ST research results
RT+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah
RA14.4.  generalizability of research results   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah
RA14.6.  policy implications of research   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah

RA16escientific disagreement   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.

RA18eresearch quality   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
ST methodological quality
RT+RM22e assessment of variables and methods    qh   ah
RA18.6e.  hierarchy of evidence   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN The strongest evidence for the effectiveness of a preventive intervention is obtained from multiple randomized controlled trials, including large scale field trials. In the middle of the hierarchy is evidence from well-controlled trials without randomization. The weakest evidence is evidence suggested by respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, prior service delivery programs, or reports by expert committees.

RA20eresearch ethics   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN For prevention and treatment research, this involves the following issues, among others: minimized risks to subjects; reasonable risks to subjects in relation to anticipated benefits; equitable selection of subjects, particularly when there is already a strong presumption that the intervention will benefit the subjects; informed consent is sought and properly documented; monitoring data collection to assure the safety of subjects; adequate provision to protect the privacy of the subjects and maintain the confidentiality of the data.
BT+MY2e ethics    qh   ah
RT+RJ study subject    qh   ah
RA20.2.  human subject protection   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah
+RLe sample selection    qh   ah

RA22eresearch in practice   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN Studies on the application of research findings; role of research in practice.
ST application of research
NT ND2.6 information transfer from research to practice    qh   ah


RBresearch organization and management   d-out   qh
SN General discussion of research planning, funding, problems, direction, and needs.
RT+JA2.2e health services research    qh   ah
+JA2.4e prevention research    qh   ah
+MP18e public policy    qh   ah
+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah
+S field, discipline, or occupation    qh   ah

RB2research project management   qh
RT+MQ8.2e program planning    qh   ah
RB2.2.  collaborative study   qh

RB4eresearch funding   qh
ST research opportunity
NT JV6.6.4 health care research funding    qh   ah
BT+MQ12.12e funding    qh   ah
RT JE10e demonstration programs    qh   ah
RB4.2.  research funding source   qh
ST research funding organization
BT+MQ12.12.4e funding source    qh   ah
RT+MP26 political unit    qh   ah
RB4.4.  research funding recipient   qh
HN Introduced 1995.
ST research grantee
BT+MQ12.12.6 funding recipient    qh   ah
RB4.6.  type of research funding   qh
RT+NF14.4 education funding    qh   ah
RB4.6.2.  .  research grants   qh

RB6eresearch dissemination   qh

RB8research organization   qh
ST research center
RT RA10e research agenda    qh   ah
RB8.2.  research facility   qh
RT JT14.4.6 university hospital    qh   ah


RCeresearch and evaluation method   d-out   qh
ST evaluation method
evaluation technique
research method
NT+MA2.20 methodological approach to society and culture    qh   ah
+PD12 epidemiological method    qh   ah
+RD type of research study    qh   ah
+RE environment of study    qh   ah
+RF purpose of study    qh   ah
+RG time scope of study    qh   ah
+RJ study subject    qh   ah
+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah
+RLe sample selection    qh   ah
+RMe variable, characteristic, factor    qh   ah
+RPe data collection    qh   ah
+RQe data analysis method    qh   ah
+RRe qualitative research method    qh   ah
+RS models and simulation    qh   ah
RT+CQ physical and chemical analysis and measurement    qh   ah
+FV24e knowledge acquisition method    qh   ah
+HB AODU screening, identification, and diagnostic method    qh   ah
+HCe medical screening and diagnostic method    qh   ah
+HHe psychosocial screening and diagnostic method    qh   ah
+JA2.2e health services research    qh   ah
+JA8.4e needs assessment    qh   ah
+JA8.6 community risk and needs assessment    qh   ah
 MQ8.2.2 planning method    qh   ah
 MR2.2 market research    qh   ah
+MT6 analytical method in economics    qh   ah
+PDe epidemiology    qh   ah

RDtype of research study   d-out   qh
HN Changed descriptor 2000; through 1999 use "study type."
SN A general characterization of a study, based on more specific methodological characteristics. Research methodologies are detailed in the remainder of the research methods classification.
ST research project
research study
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RT+NK document or presentation by content and format    qh   ah
+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah
RD2e.  empirical study   qh
RD2.2e.  .  statistical data   qh
SN Use for documents that report statistical data.
NT NM44 data set    qh   ah
RT+NL4 non-fiction    qh   ah
+RM10 individual vs group variable    qh   ah
+RQ8e quantitative data analysis    qh   ah
RD2.2.2e.  .  .  individual-level statistical data   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RD2.2.4e.  .  .  aggregate-level statistical data   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RD2.4.  .  experiment   qh
SN A study in which one or more independent variables are controlled through manipulation; that is, the experimenter varies the values for these variables and observes the effects of this variation. Includes studies with an experimental group (also called treatment group) and a control group.
ST experimental research
experimental study
experimentation
BT+RK2.6.4e controlled study    qh   ah
RT+RE2e laboratory study    qh   ah
+RE4e field study    qh   ah
+RE6e clinical study    qh   ah
RD2.4.2e.  .  .  trial study   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
BT+FV22e evaluation    qh   ah
+RF2.6e evaluation study    qh   ah
RT+RE6e clinical study    qh   ah
RD2.4.2.2e.  .  .  .  randomized controlled trial   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RD2.4.2.2.2.  .  .  .  .  confirmatory trial   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RD2.4.2.2.4.  .  .  .  .  replication trial   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
BT+RD10.8e replication study    qh   ah
RD2.4.2.4e.  .  .  .  controlled trial without randomization   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT RD2.6.2e case-control study    qh   ah
RD2.4.2.6e.  .  .  .  large-scale field trial   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
BT+RE4e field study    qh   ah
RD2.4.2.8e.  .  .  .  prevention trial   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN Assesses the capacity of a preventive intervention to avoid part or all of the elements of an etiological chain and most notably the occurrence of the disorder of interest. Focus on such questions as the effects of the intervention on its recipients; the differential effectiveness of its components; the differential response of population subgroups; and the assessment of the intervention's temporal characteristics (e.g., latency between the intervention and appearance of its effects; duration of those effects; requisite duration of involvement in the intervention). By necessity, such trials are field-based and require that the researcher be sensitive to the unique demands of the settings involved in the trial.
ST intervention trial
preventive trial
RD2.4.2.10e.  .  .  .  clinical trial   qh
SN A planned experiment designed to assess the efficacy of a treatment in humans by comparing the outcomes in a group of patients receiving the test treatment with those observed in a comparable group of patients receiving a control treatment. Patients in both groups are enrolled, treated, and followed over the same time period.
BT+RE6e clinical study    qh   ah
+RJ8.2e individual as study subject    qh   ah
RD2.6.  .  quasi-experimental study   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
ST quasi-experimental research design
RD2.6.2e.  .  .  case-control study   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN A study in which one or more independent variables are controlled through selection of the subjects; that is, the researcher selects subjects that fall into two or more classes according to the values of the variables to be studied, usually just two classes: those exhibiting a condition (the cases) and those free of the condition (the controls). Used especially when a randomized study is not possible.
      In case-control studies, the investigators begin at the end, rather than at the beginning, of the cause-effect pathway. The cases are selected from the persons in whom the target disease has already developed. The controls are selected from persons in whom that disease has not been noted. The cases and controls are then investigated backward in time, with inquiries intended to determine antecedent exposure to agents that may have caused the disease. If the ratio of antecedent exposure to a particular agent is higher in the cases than in the controls, and if the effect is statistically significant, the agent is suspected of having caused the disease.
BT+RG4.2e retrospective study    qh   ah
RT MT10.4.2.4e attributable risk    qh   ah
 RD2.4.2.4e controlled trial without randomization    qh   ah
RD2.8e.  .  qualitative study   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
BT+RRe qualitative research method    qh   ah
RD2.10e.  .  survey   qh
SN A study with many units of analysis (i.e., subjects or respondents), often drawn as a sample from a population and usually collecting a limited amount of data from or about each unit, using data collection methods that are feasible for a large number of units.
NT RJ8.2.4e household survey    qh   ah
RT+MP26 political unit    qh   ah
+PVe geographical area    qh   ah
RD2.10.2e.  .  .  social survey   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN A survey of individuals using *+RP12 data collection from mental responses* qh ah. "Survey" alone often is used with the meaning of social survey.
ST demographic study
poll
survey research
BT+RJ8.2e individual as study subject    qh   ah
RD2.10.2.2.  .  .  .  general population survey   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
BT+T2 general population    qh   ah
RD2.12e.  .  case study   qh
SN A study with one or more units of analysis (i.e., cases) that are studied in-depth. Usually restricted to a small number of units of analysis to make in-depth study feasible.
RT+RRe qualitative research method    qh   ah
RD2.12.2e.  .  .  case history   qh
SN The information that has been recorded about an individual, family, group, or community. The term is most often used in social work agencies and in sociological, medical, and psychiatric studies.
ST case report
BT+RQ2e description    qh   ah
RT+JN2.4e patient history    qh   ah
RD4e.  theoretical study   qh
RD6.  study of one area, group, or program   qh
ST one-group design
RD8.  research involving two or more groups   qh
HN Introduced 1995.
ST multiple group designs
RD8.2e.  .  comparative study   qh
SN A study that compares and contrasts results from individual (sub)studies that deal with the same group or program at different times or, more commonly, with different geographical areas, groups, or programs.
      In a broad sense, all research is comparative. This descriptor should be used in a more restrictive sense for comparison of groups that exist before the study is started, particularly for groups that have some degree of identity or cohesion or for groups that are defined by geographical area or political subdivision. By extension, this descriptor also is used to index studies that compare two or more programs. The descriptor is particularly applicable when each group or program is studied separately using the same study design. The descriptor definitely should not be used for studies just because they compare an experimental group with a control group; these groups are created by the researcher. In combination with this descriptor, consider descriptors such as *TE2 gender differences* qh ah. Comparison between humans and other organisms should also be indexed here.
ST comparative analysis
comparison study
RT+MA2.4 anthropology    qh   ah
+RD10.8e replication study    qh   ah
+RK2.6.4e controlled study    qh   ah
RD8.4e.  .  cross-cultural study   qh
RD10.  research involving two or more studies   qh
SN The purpose of research synthesis is to draw valid conclusions from collections of studies
ST research synthesis
RD10.2e.  .  survey of research   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
ST narrative analysis
narrative review
state-of-the-art survey
RT+NM26e literature review    qh   ah
RD10.4e.  .  meta-analysis   qh
HN Through 1995 use metanalysis.
SN A study that combines data from several studies or analyzes results from several studies to arrive at new results or confirm existing results with a higher degree of confidence. Can be a study of one time or group or a longitudinal or comparative study. Do not confuse with *+NM26 literature review* qh ah.
ST analysis of existing data
secondary data analysis
RD10.6e.  .  cross-study comparability   qh
SN Comparability of data and analysis results from two or more studies. This is important for meta-analysis that combines data from studies dealing with the same group and for comparative studies using meta-analysis of existing studies that deal with two or more groups or programs.
RD10.8e.  .  replication study   qh
SN A study that repeats an experiment or survey under similar or under different circumstances for measuring the same quantity twice or, more generally, for determining whether results match the results of the first study. In contrast, a *RD8.2 comparative study* qh ah looks for differences between areas or groups, and a *+RG2.4 longitudinal study* qh ah looks for differences over time.
NT RD2.4.2.2.4 replication trial    qh   ah

REenvironment of study   d-out   qh
SN Place where data are collected.
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RE2e.  laboratory study   qh
NT+RJ2 chemical substance as study subject    qh   ah
+RJ4e histologic study    qh   ah
RT+RD2.4 experiment    qh   ah
+WL4.6e experimental animal    qh   ah
RE2.2e.  .  in vitro study   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
RE2.4e.  .  in vivo study   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
RE4e.  field study   qh
SN A study undertaken in a natural setting rather than a laboratory or other structured environment. If appropriate, combine this term with a descriptor for the site of the study, such as *+LN34 workplace context* qh ah if the field study occurred in the workplace.
NT RD2.4.2.6e large-scale field trial    qh   ah
RT+MA2.20 methodological approach to society and culture    qh   ah
+RD2.4 experiment    qh   ah
+RPe data collection    qh   ah
 RP10.2e participant observation    qh   ah
RE6e.  clinical study   qh
SN A study that uses human subjects in a clinical context (e.g., in experimental treatment). Do not use this term to express the concept of "clinical characteristics." For clinical characteristics of a disorder, use *+GA6.4 disorder definition* qh ah.
ST clinical investigation
clinical research
NT RD2.4.2.10e clinical trial    qh   ah
BT+RJ8.2e individual as study subject    qh   ah
RE8e.  forensic study   qh
HN Introduced 1995.
RT+MO6e justice system process and procedures    qh   ah
RE10e.  postmortem study   qh
NT HD12.4e autopsy    qh   ah

RFpurpose of study   d-out   qh
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RT+JA8 risk and needs assessment    qh   ah
RF2.  research and evaluation   qh
RF2.2e.  .  research   qh
ST inquiry
RF2.2.2.  .  .  basic research   qh
SN Research driven by the aim of gaining knowledge on laws and phenomena in nature and society rather than by the direct applicability of results.
RF2.2.4e.  .  .  applied research   qh
SN Research driven by the aim of gaining knowledge for direct application to specified practical problems.
RF2.4e.  .  validation study   qh
SN A study to determine the reliability and/or validity of variables, measurements, or methods.
      Use this descriptor if the process of testing validity and reliability is discussed. However, if the validity or reliability is discussed without actually discussing the process of how it was determined, use *+RM22 assessment of variables and methods* qh ah or one of its narrower terms.
ST test validation
BT+RM22e assessment of variables and methods    qh   ah
RF2.6e.  .  evaluation study   qh
HN Changed descriptor 2000; through 1999 use "evaluation".
ST effectiveness assessment
efficacy assessment
evaluation research
outcome assessment
NT+RD2.4.2e trial study    qh   ah
BT+FV22e evaluation    qh   ah
RT+JP14e treatment outcome    qh   ah
RF2.6.4e.  .  .  follow-up study   qh
SN Studies that collect data from a group of individuals on the activities, progress, attitudes, etc., after some treatment or following their participation in a program, course of study, guidance process, etc., for the purpose of deriving conclusions on the effectiveness of the treatment or program. Do not confuse with *JP22.2 treatment follow-up* qh ah, which assesses individual patients at some time after treatment and takes appropriate measures as necessary.
RT+JP14e treatment outcome    qh   ah
 JP22.2e treatment follow-up    qh   ah
+RG2.4e longitudinal study    qh   ah
 RG2.4.6e cohort study    qh   ah
 RL10.6 sample attrition    qh   ah
RF4e.  feasibility study   qh
HN Introduced 1995. ETOH descriptor 2000.
RT JE10e demonstration programs    qh   ah
RF6e.  pilot study   qh
HN Introduced 1995. ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN A small-scale preliminary study undertaken to test the feasibility and assess the logistics of a projected large-scale investigation.
RF8.  explanation and prediction   qh
NT+PN2.6 forecast    qh   ah
RF8.2.  .  explanation   qh
ST explanatory
RT+RG4.2e retrospective study    qh   ah

RGtime scope of study   d-out   qh
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RT+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah
RG2.  one-time and longitudinal study   qh
RG2.2e.  .  cross-sectional study   qh
HN Changed descriptor 2000; through 1999 use "one-time study." ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN A cross-sectional study collects data on relevant variables one time only from a variety of people, subjects, or phenomena. The data are collected all at the same time (or within a short time frame).
      A cross-sectional study provides a snapshot of the variables included in the study, at one particular point in time. It may reveal how those variables are represented in a cross-section of a population. Cross-sectional studies often use survey techniques to gather data, for example, the U.S. Census.
ST one-time study
RT RQ14.2e synchronic analysis    qh   ah
RG2.4e.  .  longitudinal study   qh
SN Study in which the same persons or groups or phenomena are studied over a period of time.
ST long-term study
RT+PN2.4e trend    qh   ah
+RD10.8e replication study    qh   ah
 RF2.6.4e follow-up study    qh   ah
+RQ14.4e diachronic analysis    qh   ah
 RQ14.4.4e time series analysis    qh   ah
RG2.4.6e.  .  .  cohort study   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN A study following the same subjects over time. Such a study supports statements on causal factors on an individual level.
ST cohort analysis
panel study
RT RF2.6.4e follow-up study    qh   ah
 RL10.6 sample attrition    qh   ah
RG4.  retrospective study and prospective study   qh
RG4.2e.  .  retrospective study   qh
SN An investigation in which information about characteristics or events that have occurred in the past is collected and/or analyzed for a group of subjects.
NT RD2.6.2e case-control study    qh   ah
RT RF8.2 explanation    qh   ah
RG4.4e.  .  prospective study   qh
SN An investigation in which information about characteristics or events occurring in a group of subjects is collected over a period of time so that the occurrences can be related to the characteristics of the individuals as ascertained at the initiation of the study.
SN Follows a cohort of subjects and records events as they occur.
ST projective study
prospective longitudinal study
RT+PN2.6 forecast    qh   ah

RJstudy subject   d-out   qh
SN Classifies study types by the type of subject about which data are collected. Index by the highest level subject. For example, a study on the effect of a chemical substance on cell cultures would be indexed by *RJ4.2 cell culture study* qh ah; a study on neurotransmitter substances in humans would be indexed by *+RJ8 human study* qh ah. Nonhuman organisms can be specified further by a descriptor from *+W living organisms* qh ah. Human can be qualified further by concepts from *+T demographic characteristics* qh ah.
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RT+PA demography and epidemiology    qh   ah
+RA20e research ethics    qh   ah
RJ2.  chemical substance as study subject   qh
BT+RE2e laboratory study    qh   ah
RT+Y chemical substances by function    qh   ah
+Z chemical substances by structure    qh   ah
RJ2.2.  .  laboratory biomolecule study   qh
RJ4e.  histologic study   qh
BT+RE2e laboratory study    qh   ah
RT+W living organisms    qh   ah
+Xe body part    qh   ah
+XAe cell and cell structure    qh   ah
+XA6 cell by staining properties    qh   ah
RJ4.2e.  .  cell culture study   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
ST tissue culture study
RT+RJ study subject    qh   ah
+WZe cultured cell line    qh   ah
RJ6.  nonhuman organism study   qh
RT+W living organisms    qh   ah
RJ6.2e.  .  animal study   qh
ST animal subject
RT FR30e animal behavior    qh   ah
+Te demographic characteristics    qh   ah
+TW2.10.2e offspring    qh   ah
 WL6e animal strains    qh   ah
RJ6.2.2e.  .  .  animal model   qh
BT+WL4.6e experimental animal    qh   ah
RT+RS2e scientific model    qh   ah
RJ8e.  human study   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
ST human subject
RT+Te demographic characteristics    qh   ah
+WX4.10.2.2 Homo sapiens sapiens    qh   ah
RJ8.2e.  .  individual as study subject   qh
NT RD2.4.2.10e clinical trial    qh   ah
+RD2.10.2e social survey    qh   ah
+RE6e clinical study    qh   ah
 RP2.2e study subject AODU history    qh   ah
RT+LW12 mode of participation    qh   ah
+TX10.2e patient    qh   ah
RJ8.2.2.  .  .  family, adoption, or twin study   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RJ8.2.2.2e.  .  .  .  twin study   qh
BT+TW2.12.2.2e twin    qh   ah
RT+EYe heredity    qh   ah
RJ8.2.2.4e.  .  .  .  adoption study   qh
RT+EYe heredity    qh   ah
RJ8.2.4e.  .  .  household survey   qh
SN A study in which a sample is drawn from households. Within these households, individual people then are interviewed. The household is not studied as a whole.
BT+RD2.10e survey    qh   ah
RJ8.4e.  .  family study   qh
SN A study in which the family or household is studied as a whole.
ST household study
RJ8.6e.  .  group as study subject   qh
SN Use only when data about the group itself are collected. Do not use when statements about a group are based on data collected from individual members of the group.
RJ8.8e.  .  organization as study subject   qh
RJ8.10.  .  program as study subject   qh

RKstudy design, planning, execution, and result   d-out   qh
SN The underlying plan or organization of a research project or study that determines its scope and approach; also, the process of planning and organizing research activities.
      The design of a research study must consider the following components: The *RA12 research issue* qh ah or research question, the theoretical paradigm that underlies the study, the hypotheses or foreshadowing questions to be investigated, the *+RD type of research study* qh ah, the *+RG time scope of study* qh ah and how long it is going to take, the *+RL sample selection* qh ah, the variables to be studied (*+RM variable, characteristic, factor* qh ah), the measurement of these variables or *+RP data collection* qh ah, which must include *RA20.2 human subject protection* qh ah, the *+RQ data analysis method* qh ah and data analysis plan, the expected *+RA14 research outcome* qh ah, the *RA14.4 generalizability of research results* qh ah and the *RA14.6 policy implications of research* qh ah. Furthermore, the study design must consider the *+RB research organization and management* qh ah, including the study budget.
ST overall research plan
overall research strategy
research planning
research project components
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RK2e.  study design   qh
ST experimental design
research design
research strategy (individual study)
RT+JA4.12 prevention or treatment protocol    qh   ah
RK2.2.  .  statistical study design   qh
RT+RLe sample selection    qh   ah
+RQ8e quantitative data analysis    qh   ah
RK2.2.2.  .  .  factorial design   qh
HN Introduced 1995.
RK2.4.  .  assignment of study subjects to conditions   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT+JA4.6 recipient-intervention matching    qh   ah
RK2.6.  .  controlled vs uncontrolled study   qh
RK2.6.2.  .  .  assignment of subjects to study conditions   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RK2.6.4e.  .  .  controlled study   qh
NT+RD2.4 experiment    qh   ah
RT RD8.2e comparative study    qh   ah
RK2.6.4.2.  .  .  .  control variable   qh
ST control factor
RK2.6.4.4.  .  .  .  control group   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RK2.6.6.  .  .  uncontrolled study   qh
RK2.8.  .  blind and open study   qh
RK2.8.2e.  .  .  blind study   qh
ST placebo study
placebo-controlled study
RK2.8.2.2e.  .  .  .  single-blind study   qh
SN An experiment in which the subject does not know which of one or more drugs (one of which often is a placebo) is being given. The researcher, however, is aware of which treatment is being used.
RK2.8.2.4e.  .  .  .  double-blind study   qh
SN An experimental design in which neither the subject nor the researcher knows which of the two or more drugs (one of which often is a placebo) is being given at the time of the study. This reduces the potential for both subject and researcher bias.
RK2.10.  .  follow-up design   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RK2.10.2.  .  .  length of follow-up   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RK4.  study planning   qh
ST research plan (individual study)
RK6.  study execution   qh
RK8.  study results   qh
ST research results
study findings
RK10e.  ecological fallacy   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN The fallacy of inferring individual-level correlations from group-level data.

RLesample selection   d-out   qh
SN The larger the sample, the greater the power of a test based on it. However, sample size is usually limited by reason of cost, ethics (not to expose too many people to a potentially harmful treatment), or availability of subjects.
ST sampling design
sampling method
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RT RA20.2 human subject protection    qh   ah
+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah
+RK2.2 statistical study design    qh   ah
RL2e.  population study   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN A study that collects data on every individual in a population.
NT PB2.4 population census    qh   ah
RL4.  sample by method of selection   qh
RL4.2e.  .  random sample   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
RT+RL6 simple or stratified sample    qh   ah
RL6.  simple or stratified sample   qh
RT RL4.2e random sample    qh   ah
RL6.2.  .  simple sample   qh
SN A sample drawn from the whole population without regard to the properties of the sampled units.
RL6.4.  .  stratified sample   qh
SN A sample drawn with consideration of the representation of units having given properties (i.e., belonging to certain strata).
RL8.  multistage sampling design   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RL10e.  sample selection problems   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN Populations of interest in prevention studies are often hard to enumerate. For example, there is no defined population of parents with alcohol problems that could be the focus of a study of the children of alcoholics and from which a sample could be drawn. Depending on the method of recruitment (from health maintenance organizations. through workplace problems, driving problems, etc.) samples may differ greatly in the history and severity of alcohol-related problems.
RL10.2.  .  recruiting and enrolling subjects   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RL10.4e.  .  sampling bias   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
ST selection bias
RT PD12.6.2 epidemiological bias    qh   ah
RL10.6.  .  sample attrition   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN The loss of subjects from the originally drawn sample either during one phase of a study (refusal to participate, non-returned or unusable questionnaires) or from one phase to the next in a follow-up study or cohort study.
ST attrition of subjects
loss of participants over time
questionnaire return rate
RT RF2.6.4e follow-up study    qh   ah
 RG2.4.6e cohort study    qh   ah

RMevariable, characteristic, factor   d-out   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
ST subject characteristics
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RT+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah
RM2.  integration of multiple types of measures   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN Self-reports, reports of knowledgeable informants, cognitive measures, behavioral measures, and physiological measures may provide different perspectives on a construct. It becomes increasingly important to understand how to integrate these data optimally.
RM2.2.  .  multitrait-multimethod approach   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RM4.  indicator variable   qh
HN Introduced 1995.
NT MK2e social indicators    qh   ah
+MT14 economic indicators and measurements    qh   ah
RM6.  definition of variables   qh
RT+FV8.4.2 concept formation    qh   ah
RM6.2.  .  operational definition   qh
ST operationalization
RM6.4.  .  measurement scale   qh
SN A measurement scale often is the operational definition of a variable.
RT RP4e measurement in general    qh   ah
RM6.4.4.  .  .  Likert scale   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RM6.4.6e.  .  .  rating scale   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT HH6.12 semantic differential    qh   ah
RM8.  objective vs subjective variables   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RM8.2e.  .  objective variables   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN Objective phenomena are those that can be known by evidence that is, in principle, directly accessible to an external observer, although their measurement often relies on the person himself or herself as an informant.
ST objective phenomena
RM8.4e.  .  subjective variables   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN Subjective phenomena are those that, in principle, can be directly known, if at all, only by the persons themselves, although a person's intimate associates or a skilled observer or analyst may be able to surmise from indirect evidence what is going on "inside". Peoples' knowledge or perceptions of objective phenomena (be they right or wrong) is a subjective phenomenon.
      Subjective phenomena are important in the prediction of behavior (to the extent that voiced attitudes and intentions can predict behavior), as explanatory variables in social and political theories, and as indicators in comprehensive social reports on the quality of life.
ST subjective phenomena
RM10.  individual vs group variable   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT+RD2.2e statistical data    qh   ah
+RQ8.4.14.14e multilevel analysis    qh   ah
RM10.2.  .  individual-level variable   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN A variable measured at the level of the individual such as age or racial or ethnic origin.
ST individual-level effects
RT+JA6.12 internal risk and protective factors    qh   ah
+JG10 individual-level prevention    qh   ah
RM10.4.  .  group-level variable   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN A variable measured at the level of a group or area such as type of neighborhood.
ST environmental variable
group-level effects
RT+JA6.14 external risk and protective factors    qh   ah
+JG12e environmental-level prevention    qh   ah
RM12.  microvariable and macrovariable   qh
RM12.2.  .  microvariable   qh
RM12.4.  .  macrovariable   qh
RM14e.  predictive factor   qh
ST predictor variable
NT+JA6.6e risk factors    qh   ah
RT JN4.10e prognosis    qh   ah
+PN2.6 forecast    qh   ah
 RM22.6.4.6e predictive validity    qh   ah
+RQ8.4e correlation analysis    qh   ah
 RQ8.4.14.12e causal path analysis    qh   ah
RM16.  latent variable   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
NT RQ14.4.2e latent-variable models of change    qh   ah
RM18e.  confounding variable   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
RM20.  effect modifier   qh
RM22e.  assessment of variables and methods   qh
SN Assessment of variables, tests, measurements, and methods, especially with respect to their reliability and validity.
      Use this descriptor or one of its narrower terms if the validity or reliability is discussed without actually discussing the process of how it was determined. However, if the process of testing validity and reliability is discussed, use *RF2.4 validation study* qh ah.
NT RF2.4e validation study    qh   ah
BT+FV24.6 assessment    qh   ah
RT+RA18e research quality    qh   ah
RM22.2e.  .  accuracy of variables and methods   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
ST measurement error
RT MO6.8.2e evidentiary proof of AODU    qh   ah
RM22.2.2.  .  .  observer variation   qh
RT PD12.6.2 epidemiological bias    qh   ah
RM22.4.  .  missing data problem   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT RQ12 method for handling incomplete data    qh   ah
RM22.6.  .  reliability and validity (research methods)   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT RP12.4e self-report    qh   ah
RM22.6.2e.  .  .  reliability (research methods)   qh
SN The extent to which the results of a test or measurement are consistent over repeated trials.
ST consistency of measurement
statistical reliability
test retest reliability
RM22.6.4e.  .  .  validity (research methods)   qh
SN The extent to which the variable or method that is being measured is actually being measured.
ST statistical validity
RM22.6.4.2.  .  .  .  face validity   qh
RM22.6.4.4e.  .  .  .  construct validity   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN The extent to which a test measures a hypothetical construct or trait (e.g., creativity, analytical ability, persistence, mechanical competence, or achievement motivation) that is the basis for test performance.
RM22.6.4.6e.  .  .  .  predictive validity   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
ST predictive criterion validity
predictive values of tests
BT+PN2.6 forecast    qh   ah
RT+RM14e predictive factor    qh   ah
RM22.8e.  .  specificity and sensitivity of measurement   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT+HA screening and diagnostic method    qh   ah
+JN4e diagnosis    qh   ah
RM22.8.2e.  .  .  specificity of measurement   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN Ability to reject cases that do not meet criteria.
RM22.8.4e.  .  .  sensitivity of measurement   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN Ability to identify cases that meet criteria.
RM22.10e.  .  standardized test   qh
SN Tests for which content has been selected and checked empirically, norms have been established, and uniform methods of administering have been developed. Such tests may be scored with a relatively high degree of objectivity.
ST normalized test
normed test
test standardization
RM22.12.  .  criterion-referenced test   qh
SN Tests in which the items are linked to explicitly stated objectives; scores are interpreted in terms of these objectives rather than in terms of a group norm.
ST objective referenced test
RM24.  statistical effects and errors   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN There are four interrelated components that influence the conclusions you might reach from a statistical test in a research project: (1) the sample size, or the number of units (e.g., people) accessible to the study; (2) the effect size, or the salience of the treatment relative to the noise in measurement; (3) the alpha level (a, or significance level), or the odds that the observed result is due to chance; and (4) the power, or the odds that you will observe a treatment effect when it occurs. Given values for any three of these components, it is possible to compute the value of the fourth. For instance, you might want to determine what a reasonable sample size would be for a study. If you could make reasonable estimates of the effect size, alpha level and power, it would be simple to compute (or, more likely, look up in a table) the sample size.
RT+JN4.6e diagnostic problem    qh   ah
RM24.6e.  .  statistical power   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN The chance of (correctly) accepting an effect when in fact there is one. The probability of a type 2 correct determination: Determining that there is an effect when in fact there is one. The probability that, given an effect does in fact exist, a statistical effect is observed.
      The probability that a test will detect an effect of a specified size if the effect indeed exists in the population.
ST test power
type 2 correct determination probability
RM26e.  intermethod comparison   qh
HN Introduced 1995. ETOH descriptor 2000.

RPedata collection   d-out   qh
SN Data sources and data collection methods.
ST data collection as a research step
data collection method
measurement
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RT+FV24e knowledge acquisition method    qh   ah
+JN2e patient assessment    qh   ah
+RE4e field study    qh   ah
+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah
RP2e.  study subject history   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT+JN2.4e patient history    qh   ah
RP2.2e.  .  study subject AODU history   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
BT+RJ8.2e individual as study subject    qh   ah
RT HB6.2e patient AODU history    qh   ah
RP4e.  measurement in general   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
RT+RM6.4 measurement scale    qh   ah
RP6e.  laboratory measurement   qh
SN Physical and chemical tests and in vitro tests of tissues and other specimens taken from organisms. Elaborated in *+CA physical science* qh ah, *+CJ chemistry* qh ah, and *+CQ physical and chemical analysis and measurement* qh ah.
ST laboratory procedure
laboratory technique
RT+HFe laboratory test    qh   ah
 OH12.2.2 laboratory equipment    qh   ah
RP8e.  test of body functioning   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN In vivo test of body functions. Elaborated in *+CQ physical and chemical analysis and measurement* qh ah.
RP10e.  observation   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
NT NF22.4.4 student observation    qh   ah
RP10.2e.  .  participant observation   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN Research method in which data are gathered by researchers serving or posing as members of a group or organization. The researchers' scientific motives may be concealed from or revealed for subjects, depending on the circumstances.
RT+MA2.20 methodological approach to society and culture    qh   ah
+RE4e field study    qh   ah
RP12e.  data collection from mental responses   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN This term is introduced because there is no sharp line between psychological tests on the one hand and questionnaires and interviews on the other.
ST subjective response
RT+RD2.10.2e social survey    qh   ah
RP12.2e.  .  specific data collection instrument   qh
HN Introduced 1995. ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN Use this term to index specific data collection instruments, tests, scales, etc. Also index here any observational guidelines.
ST specific data collection index
specific data collection inventory
specific data collection scale
specific data collection schedule
specific data collection test
NT+HB6.10e specific AODU measurement and test    qh   ah
RP12.4e.  .  self-report   qh
SN Report by a subject of his or her own behavior or experience, or subjective collection of data on objective phenomena. Can take the form of free-form narratives, diaries, or interview or questionnaire responses. Must consider the *+RM22.6 reliability and validity (research methods)* qh ah of self report data.
RT+JN2.4e patient history    qh   ah
 NL4.2.2.2 life story    qh   ah
RP12.6e.  .  psychological or educational test   qh
SN Elaborated in *+HH psychosocial screening and diagnostic method* qh ah.
ST psychological test instrument
NT+HHe psychosocial screening and diagnostic method    qh   ah
RT NF22.4.2 academic test    qh   ah
RP12.6.2.  .  .  testing protocols   qh
RP12.8.  .  questionnaire or interview   qh
ST survey instrument
RP12.8.2.  .  .  questionnaire or interview design   qh
HN Introduced 1995.
RP12.8.4e.  .  .  questionnaire   qh
SN Filled out by subject.
RP12.8.6e.  .  .  interview   qh
SN Interviewer asks questions and records answers.
NT HH4e psychodiagnostic interview    qh   ah
 JN2.2e patient interview    qh   ah
RT FV24.4.2 interviewing    qh   ah
+LC2e interpersonal interaction    qh   ah
RP12.8.6.2.  .  .  .  face-to-face interview   qh
RP12.8.6.4.  .  .  .  telephone interview   qh
RP12.8.6.6.  .  .  .  structured interview   qh
SN An interview that utilizes a structured format: Questions may be phrased in a particular way throughout the interview process, answer categories may be used, and the sequence of the questions may be prescribed.
RP12.8.6.8.  .  .  .  unstructured interview   qh
SN A more or less free-flowing interview in which the interviewer tries to cover the topics of interest with questions formulated and sequenced on the spot in response to the interviewee.
ST informal interview
RP14e.  data collection from documents   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN The process of gathering information from documents such as preexisting records on study subjects, (e.g., patient histories or school records of students, corporate documents, or minutes of meetings) or any other documents (e.g., content analysis of speeches or of patient utterances). Do not confuse with *+NM26 literature review* qh ah.
RP14.2e.  .  content analysis   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN The determination of document characteristics (e.g., aggressiveness or peacefulness) through analyzing the language in the document (e.g., counting the number of words that connote aggressiveness or peacefulness, respectively).
BT+RQe data analysis method    qh   ah
RP14.4.  .  specific data source   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
NT JU8.2.4.16e medical examiner report    qh   ah
RP14.4.2.  .  .  emergency room reports   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
ST ER reports
RP14.4.4.  .  .  hospital discharge data   qh
HN Introduced 2000.

RQedata analysis method   d-out   qh
SN Broadly defined to include all methods of processing data for the purpose of description and analysis.
ST data analysis as a research step
NT RP14.2e content analysis    qh   ah
 RR4e qualitative data analysis    qh   ah
+RS2.6e causal model    qh   ah
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RT+MQ8.4.2e cost-benefit analysis    qh   ah
+ND10.12e geographic information systems    qh   ah
+RK study design, planning, execution, and result    qh   ah
+RRe qualitative research method    qh   ah
RQ2e.  description   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
ST descriptive analysis
descriptive methods
NT RD2.12.2e case history    qh   ah
RQ4.  estimation   qh
RQ4.2e.  .  statistical estimation   qh
BT+RQ8e quantitative data analysis    qh   ah
RQ4.2.2e.  .  .  synthetic estimation   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN A method for estimating the population parameter for a given variable for a target group or geographical area in the absence of sufficient actual data, using two steps: (1) develop a model for the variable from data for another, usually larger, group or area (which may or may not include the target group or area); (2) based on this model derive an estimate for the target group or geographical area.
RQ6e.  hypothesis testing   qh
RQ6.2.  .  statistical tests   qh
BT+RQ8e quantitative data analysis    qh   ah
RQ8e.  quantitative data analysis   qh
ST quantitative approach
statistics (method)
NT+RQ4.2e statistical estimation    qh   ah
 RQ6.2 statistical tests    qh   ah
+RS2.4e statistical modeling    qh   ah
RT+RD2.2e statistical data    qh   ah
+RK2.2 statistical study design    qh   ah
RQ8.2e.  .  univariate analysis   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN Analysis of one variable at a time, including the comparison of variable values across groups.
RQ8.4e.  .  correlation analysis   qh
SN This term is used broadly for any method of analyzing the interdependencies between two (*+RQ8.4.12 bivariate analysis* qh ah) or more (*+RQ8.4.14 multivariate analysis* qh ah) variables.
      The narrower terms refer to the classic parametric methods that use interval variables, as well as to their analogs that use nonparametric statistics and/or deal with ordinal or nominal variables. The methods that are used both with two and with more variables are listed first; they can be combined with *+RQ8.4.12 bivariate analysis* qh ah or *+RQ8.4.14 multivariate analysis* qh ah as appropriate.
ST bivariate or multivariate analysis
statistical association measure
statistical correlation
NT EX6.14.4.4e genetic correlation analysis    qh   ah
RT+RM14e predictive factor    qh   ah
+RS2.6e causal model    qh   ah
RQ8.4.8e.  .  .  regression analysis   qh
RQ8.4.10e.  .  .  bivariate and multivariate analysis of variance   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN A statistical technique for determining if differences among the means of different groups of observations exceed what may be expected by chance.
      Use both for bivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) and for multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).
RQ8.4.10.2e.  .  .  .  bivariate analysis of variance   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
ST analysis of variance
ANOVA
BT+RQ8.4.12e bivariate analysis    qh   ah
RQ8.4.10.4e.  .  .  .  multiple analysis of variance   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
ST MANOVA
BT+RQ8.4.14e multivariate analysis    qh   ah
RQ8.4.10.6e.  .  .  .  analysis of covariance   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
ST ANCOVA
BT+RQ8.4.14e multivariate analysis    qh   ah
RT RQ8.4.16 covariation of variables    qh   ah
RQ8.4.12e.  .  .  bivariate analysis   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN Analysis of the interdependence between two variables.
NT RQ8.4.10.2e bivariate analysis of variance    qh   ah
RQ8.4.14e.  .  .  multivariate analysis   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN Analysis of the interdependencies between two or more variables.
NT RQ8.4.10.4e multiple analysis of variance    qh   ah
 RQ8.4.10.6e analysis of covariance    qh   ah
RQ8.4.14.2.  .  .  .  canonical correlation analysis   qh
RQ8.4.14.4e.  .  .  .  discriminant analysis   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 1995.
SN A statistical technique in which several predictive variables are weighted and combined to produce the maximum difference or discrimination between two or more qualitatively different groups.
ST discriminant function analysis
multiple discriminant analysis
RQ8.4.14.6e.  .  .  .  factor analysis   qh
SN A mathematical technique used to explain the relationships observed among a large number of descriptive variables in terms of a smaller number of underlying or inferred factors.
RQ8.4.14.8e.  .  .  .  cluster analysis   qh
SN A statistical technique used in multivariate analysis to group together similar items or variables.
RQ8.4.14.10e.  .  .  .  multidimensional scaling   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN Procedures used to analyze judgments, usually about the similarities and differences among a set of items to determine the number of independent factors that underlie the judgment.
RQ8.4.14.12e.  .  .  .  causal path analysis   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN A method of multivariate analysis that permits the quantification of causal relationships among several variables and arranging the variables in a network of causal relationships.
ST causal network analysis
path analysis
path analysis model
BT+RS2.6e causal model    qh   ah
RT+RM14e predictive factor    qh   ah
RQ8.4.14.14e.  .  .  .  multilevel analysis   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN Multilevel analysis deals with the problem of separating the effects of individual-level and group-level variables. It decomposes the multilevel relationships between the variables into their within-group and between-group components by partitioning the variance and covariance at the individual and group level. This allows the formation and testing of hypotheses about how variables at one level affect relations at another level.
ST methods to study multiple-level influences
multilevel model
RT+RM10 individual vs group variable    qh   ah
RQ8.4.14.14.2.  .  .  .  .  hierarchical linear modeling   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN Statistical technique that permits the examination of program effects and their variability at the group and individual levels. In addition, the influence of other group-level influences (e.g., if the group is a classroom, teacher experience) and individual-level influences (e.g., parental drinking patterns) can be examined. Finally, the patterns of interaction between the group-level variables and the individual-level variables can be explored.
ST HLM
RQ8.4.14.16e.  .  .  .  multicomponent analysis   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN Methods for understanding the individual effect and mediators of multicomponent prevention programs.
ST methods to study multicomponent interventions
RQ8.4.14.18e.  .  .  .  mediation analysis   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN A mediator is a variable that is intermediate in the causal process between an independent and a dependent variable (e.g., implementation is intermediate in the causal process from program exposure to program outcome). Mediation analysis is the statistical procedure used to obtain point and interval estimates of mediated effects that are used to test hypotheses regarding the process by which an independent variable affects a dependent variable. Mediation analysis is important in prevention research because it provides evidence for or against different theories and it can be used to identify the effective and ineffective components in prevention programs.
RQ8.4.16.  .  .  covariation of variables   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT RQ8.4.10.6e analysis of covariance    qh   ah
RQ8.6.  .  parametric and nonparametric statistics   qh
RQ8.6.2.  .  .  parametric statistics   qh
SN Statistical methods based on assumptions of the distribution of variable values according to distributions defined by the parameters of the variables, such as normal or binomial distributions. More powerful than nonparametric statistics, but usable only if the data follow the assumptions, or at least do not deviate too far.
RQ8.6.4.  .  .  nonparametric statistics   qh
SN Forms of descriptive or sampling statistics applied to data when no assumptions can be made about the distributions involved.
RQ10.  validation methods   qh
RQ10.2e.  .  cross-validation   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN Examining the same phenomenon in various ways or from various angles, using different data collection and analysis methods.
ST triangulation
RT+RRe qualitative research method    qh   ah
RQ12.  method for handling incomplete data   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RT RM22.4 missing data problem    qh   ah
RQ14.  synchronic and diachronic analysis   qh
RQ14.2e.  .  synchronic analysis   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
RT RG2.2e cross-sectional study    qh   ah
RQ14.4e.  .  diachronic analysis   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
ST longitudinal analysis method
RT+RG2.4e longitudinal study    qh   ah
RQ14.4.2e.  .  .  latent-variable models of change   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
BT+RM16 latent variable    qh   ah
RQ14.4.4e.  .  .  time series analysis   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
ST time line method
RT+RG2.4e longitudinal study    qh   ah
RQ16e.  geographic analysis   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN An array of analyses that focus on the role of space (i.e., distance and area), place (i.e., space plus social and physical context), and location (i.e. the impact of being in specific spaces and places).
RT+PT4.4e geographic factors    qh   ah
RQ16.2e.  .  spatial data analysis   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN Statistical techniques for measuring and modeling how phenomena are related geographically.
ST spatial analysis
RT+ND10.12e geographic information systems    qh   ah
RQ16.2.2e.  .  .  spatial autocorrelation   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN The degree to which entities with similar values cluster in space. Any specific value (auto or self) is correlated by distance to other values, i.e., neighboring values tend to be more similar than the similarity between all of the other values that are more distantly located.
      Spatial dependencies facilitate new conceptualizations of alcohol-related problems. Questions such as where are alcohol-related phenomena, what is the spatial coincidence between multiple measures such as demographics and alcohol problems, and what solutions can be developed to problems related to the geographic pattern of alcohol use are presented in an entirely new, and geographic, perspective.
ST spatial dependence
RQ16.2.2.2e.  .  .  .  spatial cluster analysis   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN A technique facilitated by GIS that is widely applicable to a broad number of research issues in alcohol small area epidemiology. A cluster is a greater than expected group of similar items or occurrences (e.g., outlets, DWI offenders, deaths) that are geographically close. Spatial clustering is similar to other types of cluster analysis, with the exception that many spatial clustering techniques utilize significance testing and that space-time clusters can also be investigated. Specific spatial cluster analytic techniques are suitable for use with point or geographic area data.

RRequalitative research method   d-out   qh
HN Introduced 1995. ETOH descriptor 2000.
SN In qualitative research, data collection and data analysis are often not as clearly separated as they are in quantitative research. Also, the application of a given data collection method may be altered by the qualitative approach.
      Combine this descriptor as needed with descriptors from *+RP data collection* qh ah and/or *+RQ data analysis method* qh ah.
NT RD2.8e qualitative study    qh   ah
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RT+RD2.12e case study    qh   ah
 RQ10.2e cross-validation    qh   ah
RR4e.  qualitative data analysis   qh
HN ETOH descriptor 2000.
BT+RQe data analysis method    qh   ah

RSmodels and simulation   d-out   qh
BT+RCe research and evaluation method    qh   ah
RS2e.  scientific model   qh
SN A formal representation of natural or social systems, processes, or phenomena, explicitly describing the interrelationships among components or factors, to provide a basis for analysis, simulation, explanation, or explication of the system being modeled. A scientific model can take the form of verbal description, visualization in two or three dimensions, mathematical equations, or a computer program.
ST research model
theoretical model
RT+GA8 disease model    qh   ah
 RJ6.2.2e animal model    qh   ah
RS2.2.  .  conceptual model   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
RS2.4e.  .  statistical modeling   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
BT+RQ8e quantitative data analysis    qh   ah
RS2.4.2.  .  .  survival modeling   qh
HN Introduced 2000.
SN Can identify risk and protective factors that predict the length of time before an outcome occurs.
RS2.6e.  .  causal model   qh
SN Systematic representation of possible causal connections among variables.
NT RQ8.4.14.12e causal path analysis    qh   ah
BT+FV10e causal pathways    qh   ah
+RQe data analysis method    qh   ah
RT+AKe causes of AODU    qh   ah
+RQ8.4e correlation analysis    qh   ah
RS2.8.  .  mathematical model   qh
RS2.8.2.  .  .  structural equation model   qh
RS2.10.  .  chemical model   qh
RS2.12.  .  biological model   qh
SN Macromolecular, cellular, tissue, and whole body models.
RS4.  simulation   qh
ST computer model
RS4.2.  .  dynamic simulation   qh
ST dynamic simulation model


b-out  To Broad Outline    d-out  To Detailed Outline     qh  To Quick Hierarchy
Previous Annotated Hierarchy section    Next Annotated Hierarchy section     Search

classification thesaurus glossary dictionary definition subject heading list ontology vocabulary knowledge structure knowledge organization terminology concept